

| Franken-Corn Doesn't Pay |
Thanks to Doug Woodard
|
GMO Bt Corn Costs Farmers, New Economic Analysis Finds
Surprising
Variability in Bt and Conventional Corn Yields Price
-- A Poor Indicator
of Performance Minneapolis -
Over the last six years, farmers who planted genetically
modified Bt
corn have lost $92 million or an average of about $1.31
per acre,
according to the first farm-level economic analysis of
the product.
"When Does It Pay to Plant Bt Corn: Farm-Level Economic
Impacts of Bt
Corn, 1996-2001," is by Dr. Charles Benbrook of
Benbrook Consulting
Services. Dr. Benbrook previously served
as the Executive Director of
the National Academy of Science Board of Agriculture.
The report found that from 1996-2001, American farmers
paid at least
$659 million in price premiums to plant Bt corn, while
boosting their
harvest by only 276 million bushels - worth some $567
million in
economic gain. The bottom line for farmers is a
net loss of $92 million
- about $1.31 per acre. "On average, yield increases
due to Bt corn
have not increased farm income enough to cover the higher
costs of Bt
seed," says Dr. Benbrook. "The jump in per
acre seed expenditures with
Bt corn is by far the biggest in history linked to a
single new trait."
Bt corn is genetically engineered to express the protein-based
toxins of
Bt in plant tissues for the control of two Lepidopteran
insects, the
European Corn Borer (ECB) and the Southwestern Corn Borer
(SWCB). The
economic value of using Bt corn depends largely on whether
infestation
levels of ECB/SWCB impact yields.
"We estimate that the U.S. has foregone about 350
million bushels of
corn export sales to the European Union since 1996/97
largely because
the EU doesn't want GMOs," says Dan McGuire, of the American
Corn
Growers Association (ACGA). "The findings of this
report are part of a
triple negative for farmersÖlost corn exports, lower
corn prices and
less net profit from GMO (Bt) corn, which is why the
ACGA cautions
farmers on their seed choices."
"At this point, in most cases Bt corn doesn't pay for
farmers," says
Kristin Dawkins, of the Institute for Agriculture and
Trade Policy. "We
hope this report helps farmers get better numbers about
the costs
associated with GMO crops so they can make informed planting
decisions."
This report is part of series being published by the
Institute for
Agriculture and Trade Policy and Genetically Engineered
Food Alert on
economic and legal issues related to genetically engineered
crops. A
four page summary of the report as well as the full 33
page report can
be downloaded at:
http://www.iatp..org
--